Hunting in the rut?

Question: You recently said it’s easier to hunt deer during the rut – where do you get your information? Have you compared the buck kill rates in states that allow deer to be hunted during the rut against the deer harvest in California?

The buck-to-doe ratio in California is terrible. I don't believe the deer kill in California would be any higher than in any states that allow the deer harvest during the rut.

It is not that easy to hunt deer in other states during the rut. If that were true the deer kill would be huge in those states, rather than their average yearly take.

Also, why does the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) require that those hunters that do not harvest a deer in California must still call in or go online to report a non-harvest?

If 260,000 licenses are sold and 50,000 hunters report a successful kill, why do the other 210,000 hunters have to report unsuccessful hunts? You already know simply by the successful hunters reports that the rest of the hunters were unsuccessful.

What possible information can you gather by asking the unsuccessful hunters to verify an unsuccessful hunt? It is redundant information. (John M.)

Answer: Bucks in rut are much more vulnerable to all forms of predation – including by humans – because all they are interested in is mating and fighting, nothing else. They don't even eat during that time period because they are so focused on the other activities.

Plus, they are usually concentrated in certain places because rut hunting usually occurs on winter ranges for migratory deer.

According to CDFW Game Program Manager Craig Stowers, the reason we don't do more is because most California deer hunters would prefer a chance to hunt every year instead of having to wait to be drawn for a buck hunt.

Our stats show hunter success numbers for late season hunts are much higher than general season hunts, thus requiring fewer hunters in the field to reach harvest goals.

To view all of the harvest reports posted online, please go to www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/hunting/deer/deerhunt.html .

It would make sense if the other states you are referring to are whitetail states where they are actively trying to reduce populations. That would explain why they actively hunt in the rut.

We ask the success questions because we need to determine more information than just how many deer are killed. We want to know why people were unsuccessful.

For example, if they were unsuccessful because they didn't even go hunting, we need to delete their information from the harvest results to give a true picture of success – those that don't even try shouldn't be included in the calculations.

We ask other questions like days spent hunting so we can paint a better picture of the amount of time and money hunters spend – all factors we use to justify the continuation of hunting. It's not just about figuring out how many deer are killed.

Chopped up carp chum?

Question: Is it legal for me to catch carp and then chop it up to use as chum when I go ocean fishing? (Chris S.)

Answer: Yes, carp can be legally used as chum in ocean waters. In inland waters, chumming is legal in only a few freshwater lakes and streams.

For a list of acceptable waters, please check section 2.40 in the Freshwater Sport Fishing Regulations booklet.

Is it illegal to have a trout on a stringer?

Question: I know that trout may not be maintained or possessed in a live condition in any container on or attached to any boat, but is it also illegal to have trout on a stringer?

We like to keep our catch on a stringer and the stringer in the water to preserve the meat. We do not attempt to keep trout alive with the intent of changing out the smaller ones. We just enjoy a good fish fry.

Thank you for any help. (Stas and Holly A., Buena Park)

Answer: Keeping your fish on a stringer in the water is perfectly fine. The fish cannot swim freely when on a stringer, and this method does help to keep them fresh until you’re ready for your fish fry!

Fishing for sanddabs

Question: When fishing for sanddabs, how many hooks can be attached to the line on a single rod? (Len P.)

Answer: You may fish for sanddabs with as many hooks as you like on a single rod, unless rockfish, lingcod, cabezon, greenlings, or salmon are on the vessel or in possession, in which case special restrictions apply (California Code of Regulations Title 14, sections 27.80 and 28.65).

Carrie Wilson is a marine environmental scientist with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. While she cannot personally answer everyone’s questions, she will select a few to answer each week in this column. Please contact her at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .